The demand for higher education is on the rise as people realize that college education is the master key of all.
Everyone wants to get into a college or university to get advanced studies and land that dream career job.
As a result of this demand, many public institutions of higher learning have become crowded and inefficient. A debate has been taking place as to whether to privatize higher learning. While this can be a good move, it has a number of negative impacts such as:
- The focus would shift to profits rather than the quality of education.
- People who do not qualify could access this education.
- Relatively poor people may not afford education anymore.
- Educators would be exploited
Evidently, the privatization of learning would bring up a raft of adverse effects on society. It may increase efficiency and help provide many students with education but may have dire consequences in the long run.
Shifting To Profit Instead Of Quality
By commercializing higher education, most learning institutions would focus on money rather than adding value to students. As such, the entire essence of learning would lack in these schools. The proprietors would be motivated by profit gains and hence losing touch with the needs of these students.
People not Qualifying Would Also Access Higher Education
Profit motives would mean a reduction in requirements to join these institutions. People with money but not qualified to join universities would paramountessays find a way to graduate. As long as one has money, he or she would buy his or her way into a college. The products of this process would not be productive https://www.chicagobooth.edu/programs/full-time/admissions/apply/essay-questions in the corporate world and, in that case, the entire economy. Therefore, commercializing this education would phd dissertation help not be the right solution for any government or country.
Poor People May Never Afford This Education
Privatization would drive the cost of tuition up from the current levels. The results of a costly education are devastating. People from financially unstable backgrounds would no longer get into colleges and universities. Private institutions would segment society where they would only serve the interests of the wealthy. Commercial institutions would charge hefty tuition fees with an aim to make profits. Disadvantaged and poor, but qualified students would be locked out.
Educators Would Be Exploited
College instructors and professors would be on the receiving end of commercialization. Driven by profit motives, proprietors of these institutions would receive little pay. The owners of these schools would be looking for ways to minimize costs as much as possible in order to have a higher net income margin.
Poor pays would kill teachers’ motivation. The net effect of an exploited educator would be felt by the student. The remuneration of professors in public institutions would be much higher than that of private schools. Instructors in a privatized setting would be burdened with work that would not be commensurate with the pay they get. As noted, these teachers would offer poorer quality as compared to their counterparts in public institutions.